![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Here's an open source laser cutter: Lasersaur. Well, it's almost open - they're still needing 8% of their funding. I thought a couple folks hereabouts might be interested. ^_^When Autodesk, a software company, moved into a an open-plan building in Waltham, Mass., three years ago, it installed what is known as a pink-noise system: a soft whooshing emitted over loudspeakers that sounds like a ventilation system but is specially formulated to match the frequencies of human voices.
Autodesk ran the system for three months without telling the employees — and then, to gauge its impact, turned it off one day.
“We were surprised at how many complaints we got,” said Charles Rechtsteiner, Autodesk’s facilities manager. “People weren’t sure what was different, but they knew something was wrong. They were being distracted by conversations 60 feet away. When the system’s on, speech becomes unintelligible at a distance of about 20 feet.”
The original rationale for the open-plan office, aside from saving space and money, was to foster communication among workers, the better to coax them to collaborate and innovate. But it turned out that too much communication sometimes had the opposite effect: a loss of privacy, plus the urgent desire to throttle one’s neighbor.
![]() |

By contrast, the work of Alex Box..![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| By Plomomedia on Flickr; background here |
What is a memory? Science writer Jonah Lehrer tells us is it’s a physical thing in the brain… not some ephemeral flash. It’s a concrete thing made of matter. And NYU neuroscientist Joe LeDoux, who studies fear memories in rats, tells us how with a one shock, one tone, and one drug injection, you can bust up this piece of matter, and prevent a rat from ever making a memory. LeDoux’s research goes sci-fi, when he and his colleague Karim Nader start trying to erase memories. And Nader applies this research to humans suffering from PTSD.
![]() |
![]() |
Socrates was sitting cross-legged in his cell when the weasel bellied in through a gap at the base of the wall.
It was a beautiful little beast, with soft, russet fur fading to cream on its belly, and bright black eyes. Its slender tail was tufted at the end, and it travelled with a liquid, looping motion. To Socrates, it seemed such a perfect creation that it might have been the original Form or Idea of a weasel on which all other weasels were modelled. The philosopher sat still as a marble statue, watching his visitor sniff and scurry its way to the crust of bread in his clay bowl.
“Kaire, Big Beard!” said the weasel. “Mind if I take this?”
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |




Want a (fake) grizzly bear coat? 'Course you do. Here's your chance to back its manufacture, via Kickstarter. And, hey, it's a San Francisco project - which is naturally a complete shock.![]() |

![]() |
![]() |
Rick Santorum: "My foreign policy philosophy is based upon my belief that America is an exceptional country - a land of freedom, prosperity & equality."
m1sp: "My friendship policy is based upon my belief that I am an exceptional person"

![]() |

![]() |
![]() |
Google could still put ads in front of more people than Facebook, but Facebook knows so much more about those people. Advertisers and publishers cherish this kind of personal information, so much so that they are willing to put the Facebook brand before their own. Exhibit A: www.facebook.com/nike, a company with the power and clout of Nike putting their own brand after Facebook's? No company has ever done that for Google and Google took it personally.
Larry Page himself assumed command to right this wrong. Social became state-owned, a corporate mandate called Google+. It was an ominous name invoking the feeling that Google alone wasn't enough. Search had to be social. Android had to be social. You Tube, once joyous in their independence, had to be … well, you get the point. Even worse was that innovation had to be social. Ideas that failed to put Google+ at the center of the universe were a distraction.
Officially, Google declared that “sharing is broken on the web” and nothing but the full force of our collective minds around Google+ could fix it. You have to admire a company willing to sacrifice sacred cows and rally its talent behind a threat to its business. Had Google been right, the effort would have been heroic and clearly many of us wanted to be part of that outcome. I bought into it. I worked on Google+ as a development director and shipped a bunch of code. But the world never changed; sharing never changed. It’s arguable that we made Facebook better, but all I had to show for it was higher review scores.
As it turned out, sharing was not broken. Sharing was working fine and dandy, Google just wasn’t part of it. People were sharing all around us and seemed quite happy. A user exodus from Facebook never materialized. I couldn’t even get my own teenage daughter to look at Google+ twice, “social isn’t a product,” she told me after I gave her a demo, “social is people and the people are on Facebook.” Google was the rich kid who, after having discovered he wasn’t invited to the party, built his own party in retaliation. The fact that no one came to Google’s party became the elephant in the room.
| Officially, only the iPad 2 and 3 can run iPhoto - but, if you fetch Apple's free iPhone Configuration Utility (OS X and Windows versions available), you can indeed install it on an original iPad, and it does appear to work quite satisfactorily. ^_^ Rather a nice app, too, both in terms of functionality and UI. A particularly adorable furry Kickstarter: The Tinies of Raglan Shire, which has actually met its original goal of $8,500 - but more probably wouldn't be badly received! It's an ad for Mercedes-Benz, but really rather cute - to promote their zero emissions "F-Cell" car, as "invisible to the environment", they took one of them, and plastered one side with LEDs, treating that as a display, fed by an image from the other side of the car. It's not perfectly transparent, of course, but quite nifty all the same. ^_^ Someone asked What do all the controls in an airplane cockpit do?. So, using a particular 737 as an example, the question was answered. =:D Cracked took a wry look at five Cold War myths - nothing revelatory, but succintly executed. Here, have an introduction to molecular biology, courtesy of the NIH. ^_^ Interesting little utility from Adobe Labs, for web designers looking to ensure their sites perform well on mobile devices as well as desktops: Shadow. It's a simple concept - essentially, it lets your mobile devices (iOS and Android) browse synchronously, under control of the desktop client, so you're literally seeing the same page on multiple devices at the same time, without needing to manually browse on each one. Quite a promising waste water treatment system, seemingly ready for initial deployment - rather than requiring energy to process the water, typically around 1.2kWh/kg, this turns the waste into an energy source, producing 0.94kWh/kg. It's the stuff of urban legends, but verifiable in this case, where a teen driver was rattling off text messages to friends, while driving at 80mph along I-84. Her last message? "I can't discuss this now. Driving and facebooking is not safe! Haha." A tragedy in any event, but even moreso for the loss of an otherwise star student. | ![]() |
![]() | Today in the Death of Print: Encyclopedia Britannica ends its print editions. "It’s a rite of passage in this new era," Jorge Cauz, the president of Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc., a Chicago-based company, said in an interview. "Some people will feel sad about it and nostalgic about it. But we have a better tool now. The Web site is continuously updated, it's much more expansive and it has multimedia." And yet, as far as I'm aware, it's still only available in highly abridged editions for mobile devices, when the entire work would likely be on the scale of only 2GB or so; similarly Grzimek's excellent Animal Life Encyclopedia, some 17 volumes in print, and not even 1GB in digital form. And then there's the new iPad, which I finally got to see in person on Wednesday - yes, the display is as good as they've said. Text is beautifully crisp, as if on perfect paper, and images are at least as good as in the hands of a good professional printer. I shan't be getting one for a while, however - the little fragments of surplus are likely to be soaked up by photography and travel. Still, who knows? As and when I get off my tail and open the store, maybe there'll even be some sales to help recoup the costs so far. ^_^; (Not huge, admittedly, especially against the hair-raising costs of, say, the Nikkor 600mm f/4..) There's quite an amazing story behind a particularly distinctive - and huge - insect that was considered extinct, until its rediscovery on a nearby.. well, technically an island, but more of a tall crag, making for a known worldwide population of 24 at that point. Finally, have a couple particularly good pony remixes: Alex S. - Party With Pinkie, a growling dance anthem (track only), and Art of the Dress (Trance Dance/Sim Gretina Remix), with a simple loop video. =:D |
![]() | Of all publications, it's perhaps a little curious that it's the Radio Times noting a rumor that Benedict Cumberbatch may be the next Master, in the Doctor's 50th anniversary next year. (The poll at the foot of the story is, not terribly surprisingly, positive on the notion, with 85% saying he should) The outcome of surviving a lightning strike - a Lichtenberg scar. Quite beautiful, despite its origin. A lengthy, meandering, and sometimes perspicacious discourse on the nature of formal education, and its place in life: Stop Stealing Dreams. Could be worth a visit, if you're in London in July: the Barbican will be hosting a James Bond exhibition: Designing 007: 50 Years of Bond Style, which 'promises to showcase five decades of gadgets, sets, costumes and cars, along with the blueprints, drawings and models that went into creating them. "It's the unseen Bond," said the show's curator, fashion historian Bronwyn Cosgrave. "We're showing the complete scope of design of a Bond film, which has never been done before." Cosgrave has worked on the show for the past two years with Bond producers Eon, with "unprecedented access" to the Bond archive in north London. Designed by architect Ab Rogers, the "immersive" show will take up the Barbican's entire ground floor and a lower level theatre, with exhibits from Dr No, to this year's forthcoming Skyfall.' I wonder if the MLP:FiM producers could be tempted into putting on a concert of the many wonderful musical numbers they've included in the show.. it'd be quite challenging, I imagine, but what an event that would be - imagine a venue filled with Winter Wrap-Up and The Smile Song. =:D If you do any DVD encoding still, or indeed, other video transcoding, you might like to kno Handbrake 0.9.6 was released the other day. Nothing massive, but various nice refinements, as well as the usual updating of the encoder libraries themselves. Free, open source, with downloads for OS X, Ubuntu, Fedora, and Windows. |
| Behind the Sofa comes out in September 2012, but if you want to pre-order, there are various incentive levels available. It's a 200 page tome, compiling many celebrities' childhood memories of Doctor Who, including the likes of Charlie Brooker, Bill Oddie, Chris Tarrant, Johnathan Ross, Paul Hartnoll, and Rick Wakeman. All profits go to Alzheimers Research UK. The hardcover will set you back £15, or PDF for £5, with packages at £20, £40, £200, and £1000 - the last (one available) nets you your memory included in the book. ^_^ And yes, Michael Grade's in there.. =:D I'm now a three-lens bunny. ^_^ Nothing exotic, but while perusing one used equipment dealer's selection on the bus in one day, I spotted a Nikkor 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 for peanuts. It's only an AF (rather than AF-S) lens, so focus is driven not by a motor in the lens, as is the norm now, but by a motor in the camera body, via a screw drive. That said, focus point changing seems quite rapid nonetheless, and the resolution seems quite acceptable, if soft when fully open. The main purpose for acquiring another lens was for situations like capturing the nephews, where painstakingly finding manual focus correct really doesn't work. =:) Slightly unusually, the design means the lens grows longer as you head toward 80mm, but also as you head down from around 40mm. Another search engine to add to the toolbox: Stealth. Their tagline? "No tracking, no targeted ads, no saved searches, no recorded IP addresses, no cookies." Seems quite elegantly implemented, too. | ![]() |
![]() |
| Want to be part of a four month long simulated Mars mission, taking place on Hawaii? Applications close on Feb 29. You'll need to have a degree in engineering, science, or mathematics, have three years of professional experience in your field, and be in a condition to pass a flight physical examination, amongst other qualifications. The Royal Institution now has its video collection available on Vimeo as well as YouTube. If you sometimes find yourself waking up in the middle of the night, and unable to get back to sleep for a couple hours - that may, in fact, be what we're more attuned to naturally. | ![]() |
BLAG also contends that Congress should remain cautious, especially in an area of so much social divisiveness, by holding the purported federal definition of marriage steady while waiting to see how the states tinker with new definitions. The Court finds the contention similar to arguments that were advanced in support of antimiscegenation laws. Proponents similarly argued that the long-standing tradition of the separation of the races provided justification for prohibiting interracial marriage. The lower court in Loving found that God had created the races and placed them on separate continents in order that there “would be no cause for such [interracial] marriages.”
Congress cannot, like an ostrich, merely bury its head in the sand and wait for danger to pass, especially at the risk of permitting continued constitutional injury upon legally married couples. The fact that the issue is socially divisive does nothing to relieve the judiciary of its obligation to examine the constitutionality of the discriminating classifications in the law.
![]() |
Nearly all Arabic words consist of a three-consonant root slotted into a pattern of vowels and helper consonants. The root gives the word its base meaning, while the pattern modifies this meaning in a systematic and predictable way. This idea is so cool that you'd think it came from a constructed language, and yet Arabic has actual native speakers who live completely normal lives and will not try to talk to you about Runescape.
Arabic has a number of very unusual agreement rules. My absolute favorite is that all non-human plurals are grammatically feminine singular: al-kutub hadra' (الكتب حضراء) 'The books, she is green'
And then there is this beast: ع a consonant pronounced so far back in the throat that you must wait two hours after eating to safely attempt it. Naturally it's one of the most common sounds in the language.
![]() | ![]() |
| Are these not quite wonderful examples of transportation? ^_^ |
OK so for convenience, I'll just break it down to the kind of people who will like this movie, vs. those who won't. You pick your category and then you will know if you should see it. Because 1 out of 20 people will love this, and the rest will think it is the worst movie ever.
You will love it if: 1: You felt 2001 could have been even slower paced and still be awesome 2: You love really thinky sci-fi even if it doesn't involve people shooting aliens 3: You are crazy in love with 80's hair styles and weird synth music (this movie takes place in 1983, and takes that responsibility VERY seriously) 4: You loved Agent Smith's delivery of lines in The Matrix, and would have liked it if he talked even more slowly and threateningly 5: You think the only good sci-fi is 70's Russian sci-fi
You will hate this movie if: 1: You enjoy having more than one person deliver lines over the course of two hours (basically one speaking part in this movie, though the actor does a good job) 2: You don't like when movies are very, very pretentious 3: You like your movies to generally make an effort to make sense (at one point I swear the main guy gets a phone call from Speak-n-Spell) 4: You don't like when movies spend a considerable amount of their running time trying to injure the viewer's senses 5: You like a really good ending (if you look over the reviews, whether people loved or hated this movie everyone agrees the ending was weak)
All things considered, I really liked this movie, and so did the people I saw it with. But that's a bunch of film geeks. If you're a weird film geek too, I recommend it.
I saw this film at the AFI film festival. Before the film started the director said "I hope you're as messed up in the head as I was when I made this film." He was very right. The film is not for everybody, nor should it be. It is long, confusing, and I loved every minute of it. It is a film you have to buy into to enjoy, but once you're in you're in for a trip. A brilliant piece of science fiction, and contains one of the scariest scenes I have seen in a long time. The cinematography was also brilliant and some phenomenal lighting. This movie is not for those with a short attention span, but anybody who can sit through 2001, Enter the Void, or Stalker should love this film.
![]() |
![]() |